The homepage's "Design-doc task status" panel (tools/web_frontend/server.py's
fetch_design_task_panels/render_design_task_panels) currently walks
design_docs/*.md over the GitHub Contents API to find each doc's title,
**Beads:** epic pointer, and task table — the whole reason nf-ijyi's fix
(#1200) had to batch that into one GraphQL call. bd epics already carry
everything the panel needs locally (title, tasks, status — see
fetch_bd_epics/_epics_by_id, already used by /beads), no GitHub fetch
required.
Aedan, in chat, 2026-08-20:
> can you just read the designdocs from the beads epic for them?
> we could change from DD view to a view of epics, and just render a link > to the code repo for designdocs (just a link to > https://github.com/cfsh/ninefold/tree/main/design_docs)
> and we can change the design as a followup
Proposed shape: swap the homepage panel's fetch from
fetch_design_task_panels to something like fetch_bd_epics (filtered to
non-closed epics), render with render_bd_epics/_bd_epic_panel (already
built for /beads), and add one static link to the design_docs GitHub
folder near the section heading instead of a per-panel doc link. Once done,
fetch_design_task_panels, _recording_gh, Gh.contents_files, and the
Contents-API design-doc-content path become dead code on the homepage — a
second, likely follow-up cleanup pass.
None.
Superseded by nf-ofmi (https://nfold.dev/issue/nf-ofmi) — Aedan's newer ask covers this swap and extends it: per-epic design-doc links via a
**Design doc:**pointer in the epic's description (instead of this issue's one static design_docs folder link), rendered on/,/beadspanels, and/board/<epic-id>. The full prescriptive card is a comment on nf-ofmi; the chat quotes recorded here are cited there. Closing as duplicate.