Twinned from https://github.com/cfsh/ninefold/issues/1108 by tools/beads/import_github.py's reconcile pass.
Suggestions from ninefold-reviewer's review of #1083
PR #1083 (design doc 012) is CONVERGED and Aedan has approved it, but four small residuals have been flagged repeatedly across many review passes (up to 7 consecutive) without ever being fixed. None of them block merge — that's why they're here instead of blocking the gate — but each is a real, small defect worth a follow-up pass:
design_docs/012-jj-and-the-merge-pipeline.md §5.1 point 4 ("...*(This is fork §7.1 — Aedan decides on this doc.)*") and the T4 row in the §8 task table ("...fork §7.1") both still say fork §7.1 is undecided, even though §7 and T4's own detailed card ("Fork settled 2026-08-18: gate + triggers...") already show it settled. A reader who stops at either spot will think it's still open..claude/commands/design.md misattributes 005b. The canonical-card-format writeup ("008 and 009 are the worked examples — 005b predates the format and carries the same content as dense paragraphs...") is wrong: 005b's task cards already use labeled paragraphs (Goal/Context/Build/Tests/PR shape/Done when — see design_docs/005b-affected-probe-selection.md:124-169). What actually matches "dense paragraphs" is design 011's T1-T9 (e.g. design_docs/011-task-tracking-on-beads.md:275-289).tools/nflib/devcli.py. Both T3 (verb_push hook) and T9 (dev.py rebase) make this module load-bearing, but the top-level §6 file-by-file list never names it — a session implementing from §6 alone would miss it.Unclaimed — pick this up as a small cleanup pass over the merged doc, or fold it into whatever PR next touches design_docs/012.
None.
No comments.